Article Section |
|
Home Articles Central Excise Experts This
|
Submit New Article
|
|
|
Central Excise - Articles - Knowledge sharing |
Showing 281 to 300 of 390 Records |
|
|
CHANGE OF CLASSIFICATION IS TO BE PROSPECTIVE AND NOT RETROSPECTIVE
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
February 9, 2012
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
SMALL IS NOT THAT BEAUTIFUL FOR COCONUT OIL
|
|
By: - jayaprakash gopinathan
Dated:
January 13, 2012
|
|
All Articles by:
jayaprakash gopinathan
View Profile
|
|
|
SPECIAL DRIVE COULD NOT BE A JUSTIFICATION FOR VIOLATION OF NATURAL JUSTICE
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
January 10, 2012
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
All provisions regarding Depot Valuation in central excise
|
|
By: - Amit Kumar
Dated:
December 17, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Amit Kumar
View Profile
|
|
|
CONVERSION OF WRIT PETITION INTO APPEAL
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
December 6, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
ADJUDICATION ORDER IN TERMS OF AMENDED LAW, AFTER ISSUANCE OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE, HAVING RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT.
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
November 19, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
RE-PACKING, LABELLING WOULD AMOUNT TO PROCESS OF PACKING AND AMOUNT TO MANUFACTURE.
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
November 18, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
RETURNING OF REFUND APPLICATION CANNOT BE TREATED AS ITS DISPOSAL.
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
October 31, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
Records maintained by a registered Central Excise Manufacturer / Dealer
1 Comment
|
|
By: - ajay singh
Dated:
October 10, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
ajay singh
View Profile
|
|
|
DEPARTMENTAL OFFICER, BEING A MEMBER OF ICWAI, CAN BE APPOINTED AS COST ACCOUNTANT.
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
September 29, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
Cables held not part of wind mills – a weakly presented case lost before the Supreme Court in case of Nicco Corporation Ltd.
|
|
By: - C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
September 26, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
NON MAINTAINABILITY OF APPEAL TO HIGH COURT AGAINST THE ORDER OF CESTAT.
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
August 21, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
Manufacture for captive use – notes in audited account used as valid evidence against appellant company even for extended period.
|
|
By: - C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
May 18, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
C.A. DEV KUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
ALL PROCESS WOULD NOT AMOUNT TO MANUFACTURING UNDER CENTRAL EXCISE ACT, 1944
1 Comment
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
April 25, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
REITERATING RELEVANT DATE AND MOVABILITY OF FURNITURE
|
|
By: - jayaprakash gopinathan
Dated:
April 6, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
jayaprakash gopinathan
View Profile
|
|
|
TRIBUNAL IS TO ISSUE A SHOW CAUSE BEFORE TAKING UP THE APPEAL FOR DISMISSAL ON ACCOUNT OF FAILURE OF PRE DEPOSIT
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
March 24, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
OBLIGATION OF A MANUFACTURER OR PRODUCER OF FINAL PRODUCTS AND A PROVIDER OF TAXABLE SERVICES
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
March 20, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
Section 11A - Branches opened for invocation of extended time limit..
|
|
By: - Pradeep Jain
Dated:
March 7, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Pradeep Jain
View Profile
|
|
|
AMENDMENTS IN CENTRAL EXCISE ACT – FINANCE BILL, 2011
|
|
By: - Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
March 3, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
Section 11E - A Welcome Step
|
|
By: - Pradeep Jain
Dated:
March 3, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Pradeep Jain
View Profile
|
|
|
|
............ |
|