9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Violation of principles of natural justice in adjudication of show-cause notice.
In this case, the appellant had placed orders for importation of precious stones from Hong Kong. The Customs authorities intercepted two mail bags sent by foreign suppliers to the appellants, containing items declared as "Rough Sapphire" but found to be "Rough Emerald" upon examination. The authorities suspected a violation of Section 82 of the Customs Act and seized the goods under Sections 111(d) and (m) of the Act. The Commissioner of Customs proposed to extend the time for confiscation under Section 110(2) by issuing a show-cause notice to the importer. However, the notice was adjudicated upon before being served on the importer, leading to a violation of natural justice principles. The Commissioner's haste in adjudication without allowing sufficient time for the notice to reach the party was noted. The Commissioner's directive for the appellant to appear within a short period was deemed unreasonable, as it did not provide adequate time for preparation or a fair hearing. The Tribunal found the adjudication process flawed due to the Commissioner's failure to distinguish between evidence submission and a personal hearing. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case, instructing the Commissioner to adjudicate the show-cause notice in compliance with the principles of natural justice, allowing for a fair hearing and due process. The Commissioner was granted the discretion to issue a corrigendum to the notice if necessary. This judgment highlights the importance of upholding the principles of natural justice in administrative proceedings, emphasizing the right to a fair hearing and adequate time for parties to respond to show-cause notices. It underscores the need for proper adjudication procedures to prevent procedural irregularities and ensure a just outcome.
|
