9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order
Analysis: 1. The appellant's representative argued that mistakes had crept into the Final Order. The mistakes highlighted included the department's case regarding payments collected, alleged violations of regulations, and the basis for revocation of the license. 2. The appellant's counsel contended that the Tribunal exceeded the scope of the show cause notice and failed to follow the precedent cited. It was argued that there was no violation of Customs House Agent Regulations or sub-letting of the license. 3. The respondent's representative, on the other hand, referenced various paragraphs of the final order and asserted that the Tribunal had thoroughly considered all aspects of the case without any mistakes. 4. The Tribunal, after careful consideration, concluded that there was no mistake apparent on the face of the record. It was acknowledged that different views might exist in similar cases, but this did not constitute a mistake. Consequently, the application for rectification of mistake was rejected.
|
