1990 (4) TMI 201 - HC - Companies Law

Summary

Issues Involved:

1. Validity of the scheme of amalgamation/merger under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
2. Approval of the scheme by the requisite majority of shareholders and creditors.
3. Compliance with statutory requirements and procedural fairness.
4. Impact on public interest and tax liability considerations.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the Scheme of Amalgamation/Merger:

The petitions were filed under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking approval for the amalgamation of Indo Continental Hotels and Resorts Ltd. (transferee-company) and Hotel Pink City Pvt. Ltd. (transferor-company). The court examined the objects and financial status of both companies. The transferee-company, incorporated on May 2, 1970, with an authorized share capital of Rs. 1 crore, operates a four-star hotel in Jaipur and a five-star hotel under construction in Ajmer. The transferor-company, incorporated on April 26, 1973, with an authorized share capital of Rs. 25 lakhs, operates a three-star hotel in Agra. The court noted the benefits of amalgamation, including infrastructural facilities, assured business from tourists, efficient personnel management, financial assistance, and public interest benefits.

2. Approval by the Requisite Majority of Shareholders and Creditors:

Separate meetings for the creditors and members of both companies were held on July 10, 1988, as ordered by the court. The meetings were chaired by appointed advocates, and the reports indicated that the majority approved the scheme with a modification to the share exchange ratio. The original proposal of five equity shares of Rs. 10 each for one equity share of Rs. 100 was modified to four equity shares of Rs. 10 each. The court confirmed that the resolutions were passed by the statutory majority in accordance with section 391(2) of the Act.

3. Compliance with Statutory Requirements and Procedural Fairness:

The court ensured compliance with statutory requirements, including notices to the Official Liquidator and the Regional Director, Company Law Board. A chartered accountant was appointed to scrutinize the books and relevant papers, who reported that the scheme was not prejudicial to the interests of members, shareholders, creditors, and employees. The Regional Director did not oppose or support the scheme, leaving the decision to the court's discretion. The court also addressed an application by the Income-tax Department, allowing its counsel to present arguments.

4. Impact on Public Interest and Tax Liability Considerations:

The court referenced principles from the Madras High Court in In re Coimbatore Cotton Mills Ltd. and Lakshmi Mills Co. Ltd., emphasizing that the scheme should be beneficial, fair, and in public interest. The court rejected the Income-tax Department's argument that the scheme aimed to avoid capital gains tax, noting that both companies were engaged in legitimate hotel business and the amalgamation provided numerous benefits, including financial stability and improved services. The court concluded that the scheme was not designed to avoid tax liability and was in the public interest.

Conclusion:

The court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation with the modification in clause 4, stating that for every one equity share of Rs. 100 of the transferor-company, four equity shares of Rs. 10 of the transferee-company would be allotted. The scheme was deemed fair, reasonable, and in the interest of all stakeholders, including members, creditors, and the public. The scheme took effect from April 1, 1987.