Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2002 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2002 (1) TMI 1209 - HC - Companies Law

Issues:
Bail application under sections 8(1), 19(1)(b) of FERA and sections (3) and (4) of FEMA.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Initiation of Investigations:
The petitioner filed a bail application under relevant sections of FERA and FEMA. The Enforcement Directorate initiated investigations after noticing abnormal foreign exchange outflow from the stock market. The petitioner, a director of a company, was summoned for non-compliance, leading to a complaint for prosecution. Investigations revealed irregularities in overseas investments and sale of shares without RBI approval.

2. Allegations and Investigations:
The petitioner's company sold shares of HFCL to FIIs below market rates without RBI approval, violating FERA provisions. Investigations confirmed violations, leading to the petitioner's arrest. The petitioner's argument of being a victim due to association with a corruption-exposing entity was dismissed, and investigations were deemed essential.

3. Legal Arguments:
The petitioner's defense included lack of obligation to seek RBI approval for FII transactions and compliance with SEBI regulations. However, RBI confirmed violations, contradicting the petitioner's claims. The petitioner's plea for bail was based on professional reputation and no risk of absconding, citing legal precedents.

4. Judicial Decision:
The court dismissed the bail application, considering the seriousness of allegations and ongoing investigations. Granting bail was deemed potentially detrimental to evidence collection in complex white-collar crime cases. The court emphasized the need for thorough investigations, especially in cases involving international elements, and concluded that no grounds for bail were established at that stage.

In conclusion, the court denied bail to the petitioner based on the gravity of allegations, ongoing investigations, and the complexity of white-collar crime cases, emphasizing the importance of evidence collection and the lack of established grounds for bail at that juncture.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates