Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2003 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2003 (4) TMI 403 - HC - Companies Law

Issues:
Violation of Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 by using the name Dandi and pictorial representation on salt packets.

Analysis:
The petitioner, an advocate, filed a Writ petition seeking to restrain respondent Nos. 1 and 2 from manufacturing, stocking, and marketing their product 'kitchen salt' under the trade mark of Dandi with a pictorial representation resembling Mahatma Gandhi picking up salt. The petitioner argued that this use violates the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950. Respondents countered, claiming the petition was filed by business rivals and citing a previous case in Bombay High Court, which was dismissed. However, the High Court of Andhra Pradesh rejected the plea of res judicata, stating that the previous courts did not consider the Writ petition's issues.

The Emblems & Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 prohibits the improper use of certain emblems and names for commercial purposes. Section 3 of the Act prohibits the use of specified names or emblems without permission. Section 9A of the Schedule specifically prohibits the use of Mahatma Gandhi's name or pictorial representation for commercial purposes. The court found that the respondents' use of the name Dandi and pictorial representation on salt packets created an impression associating the product with Mahatma Gandhi, thus violating the Act.

Referring to the Supreme Court judgment in Cadila Health Care Ltd. v. Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., the court emphasized the importance of considering similarities rather than dissimilarities in cases of deceptive similarity. The court highlighted the historical significance of Dandi march associated with Mahatma Gandhi's protest against Salt laws, emphasizing the similarities between the salt being sold and the iconic event. The court concluded that protecting commercial interests in the name of the father of the nation would be unjust, and directed authorities to ensure Mahatma Gandhi's picture or the name Dandi is not used for any commercial purpose in accordance with the Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates