9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Challenge to order of confiscation and penalties under Customs Act, legality of impugned order under Section 129E, waiver of pre-deposit, duty amount, redemption of confiscated goods, penalty imposition. Analysis: The appellants contested the order of the Joint Commissioner that confiscated their SP Stones under relevant sections of the Customs Act, allowing redemption upon payment of fines and imposing penalties. Subsequently, the Commissioner (Appeals) directed the appellants to deposit the entire duty amount on the confiscated goods. Upon failure to comply, the appeal was dismissed under Section 129E. However, the judge found the impugned order to be prima facie illegal as the confiscated goods remained with Customs authorities, indicating duty payment upon redemption. The penalty imposed had already been deposited by the appellants. In light of these circumstances, the judge determined that the appeal could not be rightfully dismissed under Section 129E. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision in accordance with the law. The appellants were to be given an opportunity to present their case during the reevaluation process. The waiver of pre-deposit was granted due to the perceived illegality of the initial order, facilitating the disposal of the appeal without the duty amount pre-deposit requirement.
|
