9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Classification of imported glazed newsprint under Customs Tariff Heading 4802.60 and benefit of general exemption under 121.
Classification under Customs Tariff Heading 4802.60: The case involved the classification of imported glazed newsprint by M/s. Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd. The adjudicating authority held that all types of newsprints fell under heading 4801 from 1-1-1996, attracting a 10% import duty under Notifications 83/96 and 84/96 Customs. The appellant claimed classification under heading 4802.60 with a Nil rate of duty under general exemption 121. The Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) upheld the authority's decision, stating that heading 4801 covered all types of newsprints, including glazed newsprint. The Commissioner emphasized that heading 4801 provided a more specific description than heading 4802, which did not cover newsprints. The appellant's absence and lack of representation led to the dismissal of the appeal on both default and merit grounds. Benefit of General Exemption under 121: The appellant sought to benefit from general exemption No. 121 for the imported glazed newsprint under heading 4802.60. However, the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) noted that all types of newsprints were covered by Notification No. 83/96 dated 29-10-96, attracting a concessional rate of duty of 10%. The Commissioner highlighted that the specific description of newsprints in rolls or sheets under heading 4801 superseded the broader classification under heading 4802. As the appellant did not participate in the proceedings, the appeal was dismissed based on both procedural default and the merits of the case. In conclusion, the judgment focused on the correct classification of imported glazed newsprint under the Customs Tariff headings and the applicability of general exemption No. 121. The decision emphasized the specific description provided by heading 4801 for newsprints, leading to the rejection of the appellant's claim for classification under heading 4802. The absence of representation from the appellant resulted in the dismissal of the appeal on procedural grounds, reinforcing the importance of active participation in legal proceedings to present a case effectively.
|
