Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2005 (5) TMI 528 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
1. Refunds/return of excess duty amount for motor vehicles cleared as taxis.
2. Rejection of claims due to discrepancies in vehicle descriptions.
3. Rejection of claim based on engine number discrepancy.
4. Rejection of claim due to failure to collect excess duty from buyers.
5. Rejection of refund claims for delay in lodging.

Analysis:
1. The appeals revolve around refunds/return of excess duty amount for vehicles cleared as taxis. Various appeals were made regarding discrepancies in vehicle descriptions on excise invoices and registration certificates. The Tribunal noted that rectifiable errors were present, and claimants should have been given an opportunity to rectify these errors. The appeals were allowed, and orders were set aside for reassessment by the original authority after rectification of evidence.

2. In one appeal, the rejection based on failure to return excess amount to the buyer was challenged. The Tribunal found that compliance with certain conditions was not in dispute. It was highlighted that the manufacturer had returned the excess amount to the buyer, as required, and there was no stipulation for further return down the sale chain. The rejection was deemed to be based on extraneous requirements, and the appeal was allowed.

3. Another issue involved claims filed beyond the prescribed period. The Tribunal observed that it was unclear whether the delay had been considered for condonation under the General Clauses Act. The matter was remitted back to the Dy. Commissioner for rehearing and redetermination, emphasizing the need to address all issues raised by the applicants.

4. The Tribunal disposed of the appeals by allowing most of them for reassessment, except for the appeal related to clearance to a specific entity, which was allowed outright.

In conclusion, the judgment addressed various issues related to refunds, discrepancies in descriptions, failure to collect excess duty, and delays in lodging claims. It emphasized the need for rectifying errors, ensuring compliance with stipulated conditions, and considering condonation for delays in filing claims.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates