9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Disallowance of carry forward of loss under the head 'Capital gain' for the assessment year 2003-04. Analysis: The appeal was filed against the order of the CIT(A)-XV, Mumbai, which retained the disallowance of carry forward of loss under the head 'Capital gain' for the assessment year 2003-04. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim of the assessee to carry forward the capital gain/loss to the subsequent year due to the return of income being filed beyond the time limitation specified under section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee contended that the belated return filed under section 139(4) should be treated as a regular return for the purpose of carrying forward losses, citing section 80 of the Act. However, the CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision based on the amended provisions of section 80, which prohibit the determination of loss to be carried forward and set off unless the return is filed under section 139(1). During the appeal hearing, the assessee reiterated their submission that they are entitled to carry forward the loss determined by the Assessing Officer under the head 'Capital gains' as they had furnished a return of loss. The provisions of section 80 of the Income-tax Act were examined, which state that losses not determined in pursuance of a return filed in accordance with section 139(3) cannot be carried forward and set off under various sections. It was noted that the return of income in this case was not filed within the prescribed time under section 139(1), making the assessee ineligible to carry forward the loss under the head 'Capital gains'. The Tribunal declined to interfere with the decision of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal. In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the disallowance of carry forward of loss under the head 'Capital gain' for the assessment year 2003-04, based on the provisions of section 80 of the Income-tax Act, which mandate that losses must be determined in pursuance of a return filed within the specified time under section 139(1) to be eligible for carry forward and set off. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.
|
