9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The issue in this case revolves around the entitlement of the appellant for interest on the refunded amount u/s Section 27 of the Customs Act, in light of the invocation of a Bank Guarantee by the Revenue and subsequent refund sanctioned after a Supreme Court order. Summary: The appellant filed a Bill of Entry for clearance of goods, but the Revenue did not accept the declared value, leading to a dispute. The Supreme Court eventually ruled in favor of the appellant, resulting in the Revenue invoking a Bank Guarantee worth Rs. 14,72,000. The appellant applied for a refund, which was sanctioned, but their request for interest on the refunded amount was denied by the lower authorities citing the absence of a provision for consequential refund without an application u/s Section 27 of the Customs Act. The appellant contended that the department was obligated to return the excess amount collected and pay interest due to the illegal assessment order post the Supreme Court ruling. They argued that the Bank Guarantee invocation constituted a pre-deposit of duty, entitling them to interest on the refunded amount. The appellant also highlighted a CBEC Circular supporting their claim for interest. After careful consideration, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument regarding the Bank Guarantee encashment akin to a pre-deposit under relevant sections. Referring to the CBEC Circular, the Tribunal directed the lower authority to grant interest to the appellant in accordance with the Circular, considering the encashment as a pre-deposit. The appeal was allowed by way of remand for the interest to be calculated and granted accordingly. This judgment clarifies the entitlement of interest on refunded amounts in cases involving Bank Guarantee invocation and subsequent refund post a court order, providing a favorable outcome for the appellant based on legal provisions and precedents.
|
