Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2007 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2007 (1) TMI 440 - AT - Central Excise

Issues involved: Denial of Modvat credit for a refrigeration package unit purchased for an acetic acid plant under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

Summary:
The appellant, a manufacturer of organic chemicals, purchased a refrigeration package unit for their acetic acid plant and claimed Modvat credit. The credit was denied based on the exclusion of items falling under a specific heading from the definition of 'capital goods' under Rule 57Q. The appellant argued that the refrigeration unit is essential for the manufacturing process and should be eligible for credit under Rule 57Q. They cited a circular by the Central Board of Excise and Customs supporting their claim. Additionally, they referenced previous Tribunal decisions where similar items were deemed eligible for Modvat credit.

The appellant contended that the impugned order contradicted the circular and Rule 57Q provisions and was therefore unsustainable. They highlighted that the classification of a component, spare, or accessory is irrelevant for credit eligibility under Rule 57Q. The appellant also pointed out that the refrigeration unit is crucial for plant operation, similar to other items previously granted Modvat credit by the Tribunal.

The Tribunal noted that Rule 57Q does not mention tariff classification regarding components and spares, emphasizing that classification is irrelevant for credit eligibility. This position was supported by the Central Board and confirmed by a previous Supreme Court judgment. As the refrigeration package unit was deemed essential for plant operation, similar to previously approved items, the appeal was successful, granting relief to the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates