Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2007 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2007 (1) TMI 456 - AT - Customs

Issues involved: Import of capacitors, Customs duty exemption, Liability of importer and Customs House Agent (CHA), Imposition of penalties.

Summary:

Import of Capacitors:
The case involved the import of capacitors by M/s. Das Lagerway Wind Turbines Ltd. (DLWT) from Netherlands under a contract with a Dutch company. The goods were claimed to be power capacitors instead of the capacitors mentioned in the Customs Notification. A show cause notice was issued proposing confiscation of goods and penalties under relevant sections of the Customs Act.

Liability of Importer and CHA:
M/s. DLWT disowned liabilities related to the import, stating that the supplier had undertaken duty payment and clearance. The CHA challenged the penalty imposition, claiming they had doubts about the Customs Notification applicability. The importer and CHA defended their positions based on the contract terms and actions taken during the import process.

Imposition of Penalties:
After examining the evidence and submissions, it was found that M/s. DLWT did not suffer any monetary loss as the Dutch company had paid the duty, fine, and penalty. The liability to pay these dues rested with the importer as per the Customs Act. The penalty imposed on M/s. DLWT under Section 114A was deemed unsustainable as the relevant show cause notice did not allege non-payment or short-payment of duty due to collusion or wilful misstatement. The CHA's genuine doubt regarding the eligibility of capacitors for duty exemption absolved them from liability under Section 112 of the Customs Act.

Disposition of Appeals:
The appeal of M/s. DLWT was disposed of with a finding that they were not liable to be penalized under Section 114A. The CHA's appeal was allowed based on their genuine doubt regarding the Customs Notification. The impugned order was modified accordingly, and the liabilities and penalties were reassessed based on the findings of the Tribunal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates