Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2007 (9) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2007 (9) TMI 488 - AT - Customs

Issues:
1. Eligibility of truck mounted crane for exemption under Notification 61/94.
2. Classification of the imported goods under Customs Tariff Headings.

Issue 1:
The primary issue in this case was the eligibility of a truck mounted crane for exemption under Notification 61/94. The authorities had previously determined that the imported goods did not qualify for the exemption as they fell under the excluded sub-heading 8426.41 of Heading 84.26. The Tribunal was tasked with re-evaluating this determination.

Issue 2:
The secondary issue revolved around the classification of the imported goods under Customs Tariff Headings. Initially, the importers claimed classification under Heading 8426.19, but later sought classification under 8426.12 or 8426.99. The Tribunal analyzed the characteristics of the goods to determine the appropriate classification.

The Tribunal noted that the crane in question was mounted on a truck that propelled itself, making it self-propelled machinery. Consequently, Heading 8426.99, which applies to non-self-propelled machinery, was deemed inappropriate for classification. The appellants also argued for classification under 8426.12, citing previous Tribunal decisions. However, the literature provided did not align with the definition of mobile lifting frames or straddle carriers under this heading.

The Tribunal scrutinized past decisions, such as Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Ltd., to assess the classification under Heading 84.26. It was observed that the goods in question did not move under load, and the previous decision did not delve into the specific sub-headings of Heading 84.26. Ultimately, the Tribunal concurred with the lower authorities that the goods should be classified under sub-heading 8426.41, thereby denying the appellants the benefit of exemption.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appeal due to the classification of the imported goods under CTH 8426.41. The judgment emphasized the importance of accurate classification for determining eligibility for exemptions under relevant notifications.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates