2007 (11) TMI 526 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
Show cause notice validity based on limitation period.

Analysis:
The case involved the appellant, engaged in manufacturing MM Fabrics, facing a show cause notice for illicit removal of processed MM fabric based on incriminating records seized during a visit by Central Excise officers. The Excise Clerk and Managing Director admitted to the offence, and duty amounting to Rs. 2 lakhs was deposited. The notice proposed a duty demand of Rs. 5,29,071/-, interest confirmation, and personal penalties on individuals. The original adjudicating authority confirmed the demand and imposed penalties, which were upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals), leading to the present appeals.

During the hearing, the appellant's advocate did not contest the matter on merit but argued that the show cause notice issued on 19-4-04 was barred by limitation. The advocate contended that no further investigations were conducted by Revenue after 19-10-2000, making the notice issued after six months from the offence's detection time-barred. The advocate relied on various Tribunal decisions to support this argument.

The Tribunal examined the case law precedent in Jetex Caburettors Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Vadodara, where it was established that a notice issued after a period of 6 months from the date of knowledge by officers and completion of investigation is barred by limitation. Referring to similar cases like Decent Enterprises, Prashant Electrode, Lovely Food Industries, and Kirloskar Ferrous Indus. Ltd., the Tribunal concluded that the show cause notice in the present case, issued after six months from the visit of officers and completion of investigation, was indeed time-barred.

Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing all the appeals with consequential relief to the appellants. The judgment was pronounced in court on 14-11-2007.