9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Challenge to rate of duty on fuel/oil of engine room tanks 2. Challenge to duty on foodstuff on board the ship 3. Challenge to duty of 1% landing charge on CIF value of the ship imported for breaking Analysis: 1. The first issue pertains to the classification of fuel oil in the engine room for customs duty. The Tribunal has previously decided in cases such as Shiv Marine Industries P. Ld. v. C.C.E., Bhavnagar and Bhikkamal Chotelal v. C.C. & C.Ex., Ahmedabad that fuel oil must be classified under its appropriate heading. Therefore, the appellants' challenge to the rate of duty on fuel/oil of engine room tanks is not upheld. 2. The second issue involves the levy of duty on foodstuff/stores on board the ship. The Tribunal has already settled this issue in the case of Ghazibad Ship Breakers, stating that foodstuff/stores must be classified under their own heading for duty purposes. Hence, the challenge to the duty on foodstuff on board the ship is not accepted. 3. The final issue concerns the duty of 1% landing charge on the CIF value of the ship imported for breaking. The appellants argued that since duty was collected before the goods came on land, landing charges should not be applicable. However, the Tribunal noted that landing charges are assessed on a percentage basis to facilitate quick clearance, and the appellants did not provide evidence of actual expenses incurred. The Commissioner (Appeals) highlighted the potential absurdity of excluding landing charges in such cases. Ultimately, the Tribunal found in favor of the revenue, rejecting the appeal on the basis that all disputed issues should be decided in favor of the revenue. In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the classification of fuel oil and foodstuff/stores for duty purposes and ruled that landing charges are applicable even if duty is paid before the goods arrive on land. The appeal was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 21-4-2008.
|
