Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2009 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2009 (6) TMI 760 - AT - Customs

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, AHMEDABAD, in the case of M/s. Prime Forwarders, considered an appeal by Shri Sanjay Dave, the appellant, a Customs House Agent (CHA) who filed 5 Bills of Entry for clearance of Zinc Ingots and Copper Wire Rods. The Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, held that the goods were liable for confiscation as they were diverted to the local market instead of being used for export. A penalty of Rs. 50,000 was imposed on Shri Sanjay Dave under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant argued that the penalty was unjustified as he was not aware of the diversion. The Tribunal found that the appellant did not abet the diversion and set aside the penalty, stating that the provisions of Section 112 were not applicable. The Commissioner's observations highlighted the appellant's failure to fulfill obligations under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984, but noted a lack of evidence proving his knowledge of the diversion. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside for the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates