9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
Interpretation of penalty provisions u/s 9 of the Surtax Act for failure to file return u/s 5(1) when return was filed u/s 5(2) after the stipulated period. Judgment Summary: The High Court of Delhi was asked to provide an opinion on whether a penalty was justifiable under section 9 of the Surtax Act for failing to file a return under section 5(1) when the return was eventually filed under section 5(2) after the due date for the assessment year 1973-74. The Assessing Officer had levied a penalty under section 9(a) for the delay in filing the return, which was upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) but later dismissed by the Tribunal. The Revenue contended that the penalty was warranted as the return was not filed within the stipulated time under section 5(1). On the other hand, the assessee argued that since the return was eventually filed under section 5(2), there was no default under section 9. The court analyzed the penalty provisions under section 9, emphasizing that penalties were specified for specific defaults such as failure to furnish the return without reasonable cause under section 5, but there was no penalty explicitly provided for delay in filing the return. The court referred to previous case law and held that under similar circumstances, penalties were not leviable. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that there was no provision for penalty for delay in filing the return under section 9 of the Act.
|
