9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Whether capital gains of Rs.7,45,109 could be considered for computing commercial profits for the purposes of section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Whether the Tribunal was right in cancelling the orders passed by the Income-tax Officer under section 104 of the Act for the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Consideration of Capital Gains for Computing Commercial Profits: The primary issue was whether the capital gains of Rs.7,45,109 could be considered for computing the commercial profits of the assessee-company for the purposes of section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a private limited company engaged in agricultural activities and dairy farming, argued that due to accumulated past losses and smallness of profits, declaring dividends would be unreasonable as per section 104(2)(i) of the Act. The Income-tax Officer disagreed, noting substantial capital gains reflected in the capital reserve, which the assessee did not utilize for business requirements, thus making them available for declaring dividends. The Tribunal held that capital gains should not form part of commercial profits, leaning towards the view favorable to the assessee. 2. Cancellation of Orders Under Section 104: If the first issue was resolved against the assessee, the next question was whether the Tribunal was correct in cancelling the orders passed by the Income-tax Officer under section 104 for the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76. The Tribunal had previously concluded that section 104(1) could not be invoked by the Income-tax Officer, given the smallness of profits and past losses. However, the High Court, upon reviewing section 104 and relevant case laws, determined that capital gains are part of assessable income and should be considered in distributable income calculations. The court emphasized that the provisions of section 104 are penal and must be strictly construed, focusing on whether the payment of a higher dividend would be unreasonable. Legal Reasoning and Conclusion: The High Court noted that section 104 re-enacts section 23A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and emphasized that capital gains are included in the definition of "total income" under section 2(24) of the Act. The court referred to several High Court decisions affirming that capital gains form part of assessable income for dividend declaration purposes. The court rejected the assessee's argument that capital gains from agricultural land, income from which is exempt from tax, should not be included in distributable income. It concluded that no distinction is permissible between taxable and non-taxable property income for capital gains consideration. Final Judgment: The High Court held that the Tribunal's view was not legally tenable. The answer to the first question was in the negative, in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. Consequently, the second question was also answered in the negative, in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The references were disposed of accordingly.
|
