9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The judgment involves the interpretation of deduction claimed by way of adjustment u/s 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1989-90.
Summary: The assessee, a Development Officer of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, filed a return for the year 1989-90 showing total income of Rs. 18,260. The Assessing Officer disallowed conveyance allowance and incentive bonus, adjusting the income to Rs. 52,822. The assessee applied for rectification u/s 154, which partially allowed the conveyance allowance but left the incentive bonus disallowed. The matter was taken to the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and then to the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that as the issue was debatable, powers u/s 143(1)(a) could not be exercised by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal quashed the order passed by the Assessing Officer. The Revenue contended that only a certain percentage of deduction should be allowed, not an absolute order in favor of the assessee. The court referred to the apex court's observation that a mistake apparent on the record must be obvious and not a debatable point of law. Since the issue of deduction was debatable, the Assessing Officer could not proceed u/s 143(1)(a) but could have used other sections like 143(2) or 143(3) of the Act. The court held that the Tribunal was justified in favoring the assessee as the matter was debatable. The question was answered in the affirmative, in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The reference was disposed of with no costs incurred.
|
