9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Refund of tax under section 44AC for forest contractor auctioning forest produce rights. Analysis: The writ petitioner, a forest contractor, sought a refund of tax amount retained under section 44AC for the assessment year 1991-92. The Supreme Court had previously upheld the validity of section 44AC, except for the exclusion of provisions from sections 28 to 43C. The petitioner argued that section 44AC should not apply as the auction was not for goods but for the right to gather forest produce. The Revenue contended that forest produce was included in the specified goods, and the right acquired by the petitioner through the auction fell under section 44AC(1)(b). The petitioner claimed that the right to gather was different from the right to receive, as there was no giver in the case of forest produce gathering. The court referred to previous judgments and emphasized that the purpose of granting the right to gather was to transfer the title of the goods to the gatherer. The court interpreted "right to receive" in section 44AC(1)(b) to include the gathering of forest produce, which leads to the transfer of ownership. Therefore, the auction of the right to gather forest produce was considered an auction related to the right to receive forest produce. The court directed the respondents to recalculate the amount retained after applying sections 28 to 43C for computing profits and gains. The petition was disposed of accordingly, with no order necessary in the related petition. This detailed analysis of the judgment provides insights into the interpretation of section 44AC in the context of auctioning the right to gather forest produce by a forest contractor. The court's reasoning based on previous judgments and the specific wording of the statute sheds light on the application of tax laws in such scenarios.
|
