Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1973 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1973 (8) TMI 150 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues Involved:
1. Interpretation of section 20 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947.
2. Liability of the petitioner to pay sales tax dues of Indian Forest Industries Ltd. under section 20 of the Act.
3. Determination of whether the ownership of the business was entirely transferred at each stage of transfer.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Interpretation of Section 20 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947:
Section 20 of the Act states: "When the ownership of the business of a dealer, whether registered or not, is entirely transferred, any tax payable in respect of such business remaining unpaid at the time of the transfer shall be payable by the transferee as if he were the dealer, whether registered or not, and the transferee shall also be liable to pay tax on the sale of goods subsequent to the date of such transfer and shall within thirty days of the transfer apply for registration under section 9." The court emphasized that to fasten liability on the transferee, it must be proved that the ownership of the business has been entirely transferred. This includes stock-in-trade, business assets, goodwill, and other properties necessary for carrying on the business.

2. Liability of the Petitioner to Pay Sales Tax Dues of Indian Forest Industries Ltd. under Section 20 of the Act:
The petitioner, Hajipur Plywood Factory, was held liable for the unpaid sales tax dues of Indian Forest Industries Ltd. for the years 1947-48 to 1949-50. The authorities below, including the Assistant Superintendent of Commercial Taxes, Appellate Assistant Commissioner, Additional Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax, Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, and the Commercial Taxes Tribunal, all held that the petitioner was liable under section 20 of the Act. The court upheld these findings, stating that the petitioner, as the second transferee, could be held liable provided the ownership of the business was entirely transferred at both stages of transfer.

3. Determination of Whether the Ownership of the Business was Entirely Transferred at Each Stage of Transfer:
The court examined whether the business was entirely transferred from Indian Forest Industries Ltd. to Mehta Brothers and subsequently from Mehta Brothers to the petitioner. The Tribunal found that Indian Forest Industries Ltd. transferred the entire factory, including leasehold rights, machineries, tools, implements, laboratory equipment, motor-boat, furniture, fixtures, and office equipment to Mehta Brothers. This transfer was considered an entire transfer of the business. Similarly, the transfer from Mehta Brothers to the petitioner included all assets of the running concern, indicating an entire transfer of ownership. The court concluded that the findings of the Tribunal were based on relevant materials and were not vitiated in law.

Conclusion:
The court answered the question of law in the affirmative, holding that the petitioner was legally liable to pay the sales tax dues of Indian Forest Industries Ltd. under section 20 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947. The reference was answered in favor of the commercial taxes department, and no order as to costs was made.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates