Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2002 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2002 (8) TMI 802 - AT - Income Tax

  1. 2022 (4) TMI 694 - SC
  2. 2021 (3) TMI 1182 - HC
  3. 2016 (5) TMI 697 - HC
  4. 2014 (8) TMI 901 - HC
  5. 2014 (4) TMI 856 - HC
  6. 2008 (1) TMI 319 - HC
  7. 2023 (8) TMI 570 - AT
  8. 2022 (5) TMI 538 - AT
  9. 2022 (2) TMI 284 - AT
  10. 2020 (10) TMI 983 - AT
  11. 2019 (10) TMI 915 - AT
  12. 2019 (6) TMI 1403 - AT
  13. 2018 (12) TMI 1320 - AT
  14. 2018 (11) TMI 994 - AT
  15. 2018 (10) TMI 847 - AT
  16. 2018 (7) TMI 937 - AT
  17. 2018 (7) TMI 2266 - AT
  18. 2017 (10) TMI 936 - AT
  19. 2017 (5) TMI 1591 - AT
  20. 2017 (4) TMI 462 - AT
  21. 2017 (1) TMI 1422 - AT
  22. 2017 (1) TMI 1086 - AT
  23. 2017 (1) TMI 947 - AT
  24. 2016 (12) TMI 939 - AT
  25. 2016 (11) TMI 201 - AT
  26. 2016 (7) TMI 999 - AT
  27. 2016 (6) TMI 1240 - AT
  28. 2016 (6) TMI 283 - AT
  29. 2016 (5) TMI 1386 - AT
  30. 2016 (5) TMI 479 - AT
  31. 2015 (11) TMI 1582 - AT
  32. 2015 (12) TMI 47 - AT
  33. 2015 (8) TMI 125 - AT
  34. 2015 (7) TMI 860 - AT
  35. 2015 (6) TMI 526 - AT
  36. 2015 (3) TMI 140 - AT
  37. 2014 (9) TMI 119 - AT
  38. 2013 (4) TMI 864 - AT
  39. 2013 (9) TMI 79 - AT
  40. 2012 (10) TMI 172 - AT
  41. 2012 (11) TMI 135 - AT
  42. 2012 (5) TMI 665 - AT
  43. 2012 (5) TMI 674 - AT
  44. 2012 (8) TMI 257 - AT
  45. 2012 (12) TMI 116 - AT
  46. 2011 (12) TMI 585 - AT
  47. 2011 (10) TMI 656 - AT
  48. 2012 (9) TMI 281 - AT
  49. 2011 (5) TMI 244 - AT
  50. 2010 (11) TMI 953 - AT
  51. 2010 (9) TMI 1291 - AT
  52. 2010 (8) TMI 578 - AT
  53. 2009 (11) TMI 666 - AT
  54. 2009 (11) TMI 85 - AT
  55. 2009 (7) TMI 900 - AT
  56. 2008 (8) TMI 399 - AT
  57. 2008 (4) TMI 531 - AT
  58. 2008 (4) TMI 352 - AT
  59. 2007 (9) TMI 458 - AT
  60. 2006 (12) TMI 175 - AT
  61. 2006 (11) TMI 255 - AT
  62. 2006 (10) TMI 184 - AT
  63. 2006 (4) TMI 200 - AT
  64. 2006 (2) TMI 220 - AT
  65. 2006 (2) TMI 210 - AT
  66. 2006 (1) TMI 536 - AT
  67. 2005 (12) TMI 210 - AT
  68. 2005 (10) TMI 498 - AT
  69. 2005 (10) TMI 240 - AT
  70. 2005 (10) TMI 556 - AT
  71. 2002 (12) TMI 565 - AT
  72. 2002 (10) TMI 241 - AT
  73. 2002 (1) TMI 260 - AT
Issues Involved:
1. Deductibility of foreign exchange loss on foreign loans attributable to revenue account.
2. Consistency and validity of the mercantile system of accounting adopted by the assessee.

Summary:

Issue 1: Deductibility of Foreign Exchange Loss
The primary issue was whether the additional liability arising from fluctuations in the exchange rate for loans taken for revenue purposes could be allowed as a deduction in the year of fluctuation or only in the year of repayment. The assessee, ONGC, claimed a loss of Rs. 5,78,25,83,451 on an accrual basis due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, which the Assessing Officer disallowed, considering it a notional loss. However, the Tribunal noted that ONGC had consistently followed the mercantile system of accounting, where such losses were accounted for annually based on the prevailing exchange rate at the end of the financial year. The Tribunal referenced several judicial decisions, including Sutlej Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT [1979] 116 ITR 1 (SC), which supported the treatment of such losses as trading losses if the foreign currency was held on revenue account. The Tribunal concluded that the loss due to exchange rate fluctuation was real and allowable as a deduction in the year it occurred, not merely in the year of repayment.

Issue 2: Consistency and Validity of Mercantile System of Accounting
The Tribunal examined whether ONGC's method of accounting, which included recognizing foreign exchange losses on an accrual basis, was consistent and in line with accepted accounting standards. The Tribunal formulated several test questions to determine the appropriateness of the accounting method, including whether the method was consistently followed, whether it treated gains and losses similarly, and whether it adhered to nationally accepted accounting standards. The Tribunal found that ONGC had consistently followed the mercantile system since the assessment year 1982-83, and the method was bona fide and aligned with Accounting Standard-II (AS-II) issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The Tribunal also noted that the Department had accepted gains from exchange rate fluctuations in other years, reinforcing the consistency of ONGC's accounting method. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the mercantile system of accounting adopted by ONGC and allowed the deduction of the foreign exchange loss.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of ONGC, affirming that the foreign exchange loss due to fluctuations in the exchange rate for loans taken for revenue purposes was deductible in the year of fluctuation. The Tribunal also confirmed the validity and consistency of the mercantile system of accounting followed by ONGC. The appeal of Maruti Udyog Ltd. was to be decided by the regular Bench in accordance with the decision of this Special Bench on the issue of foreign exchange loss.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates