9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Misdeclaration of imported machinery value, confiscation, penalty
In the case before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI, the appellants imported a used second-hand Offset Printing Machine with a misdeclaration of value. The Commissioner noted that a similar machine imported earlier was assessed at a much higher value, and the importer admitted to lacking evidence for the declared value. The Commissioner granted abatement and fixed the assessment value lower than the declared value, considering the value of a new machine as a reference point. The goods were confiscated for misdeclaration, with an option for redemption upon payment of a fine and a penalty imposed. The appeal challenged these decisions. The Tribunal considered the Commissioner's approach of basing the value assessment on the value of a new machine and extending abatement. The Tribunal also acknowledged the importer's claim of importing the machine for actual use and directed them to provide written assurance of installation at the specified location. The Tribunal upheld the enhanced value determined by the Commissioner, as well as the confiscation and penalty due to the misdeclaration. Consequently, the impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was rejected.
|
