Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1984 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1984 (3) TMI 362 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues:
Interpretation of sales tax laws regarding the turnover of charcoal for the period 1st April, 1959 to 14th August, 1962.

Analysis:
The Board of Revenue referred a question of law to the High Court concerning the treatment of the turnover of charcoal worth Rs. 67,000 for the specified period as not liable to tax. The respondent, a dealer in firewood and charcoal, was assessed for sales tax, with a claim for exemption on tax paid on charcoal up to 14th August, 1962, which was initially disallowed by the assessing officer. The respondent's appeals and revisions led to the Tribunal ultimately accepting the contention and setting aside the tax levied on charcoal sales. The High Court was tasked with determining the correctness of this decision.

The applicant argued that a Supreme Court decision and subsequent amendments to the Central Sales Tax Act implied that charcoal should be taxed retrospectively for the relevant period. However, this argument was raised for the first time in the High Court, not before the lower authorities. The applicant also raised concerns about the wording of the question referred for consideration. Despite these arguments, the High Court decided not to delve into the case law cited by the applicant and concluded that the reference could be disposed of based on the specific point at hand.

Ultimately, the High Court's judgment favored the assessee, ruling that the Tribunal was justified in treating the turnover of charcoal as not liable to tax for the period in question. The Court found that the deduction was not allowable under the relevant sections of the sales tax laws during that period. As a result, the reference was answered in favor of the assessee, with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates