1984 (2) TMI 311 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Exemption claim on sales in the course of export
2. Classification of bone-meal as fertilizer for tax exemption

Exemption Claim on Sales in the Course of Export:
The case involved M/s. Nilokheri Bone Mills appealing against the disallowance of exemption claimed on sales in the course of export. The Assessing Authority rejected the claim, leading to appeals by the assessee. The Sales Tax Tribunal held that the sales were not in the course of export but were inter-State transactions. The Tribunal also required the assessee to prove that the bone-meal sold was actually used as fertilizer to qualify for exemption. The Tribunal framed questions of law, including whether the sales were in the course of export and if bone-meal was exempt as fertilizer.

Classification of Bone-Meal as Fertilizer for Tax Exemption:
The Tribunal and authorities denied exemption on bone-meal sales, stating the assessee failed to prove the entire quantity was sold for use as fertilizer. The High Court analyzed various references and precedents to determine if bone-meal could be classified as fertilizer for tax exemption. The Court considered the common parlance meaning and expert opinions on bone-meal's use as a fertilizer. Reference was made to judgments like Yasin Bone Mills v. State of U.P. and Porritts & Spencer (Asia) Ltd. v. State of Haryana to establish the interpretation of a commodity's character for tax purposes. The Court concluded that if a commodity is included in the State Act's Schedule B, it is exempt from sales tax regardless of its use post-sale.

Conclusion:
The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on the classification of bone-meal as fertilizer for tax exemption, citing Schedule B of the State Act. As bone-meal was considered a fertilizer under the Act, the Court affirmed the exemption. Consequently, the Court did not provide an answer to the question regarding the department's obligation to bifurcate bone-meal sales based on their use. The judgment highlighted the importance of statutory interpretations and common parlance meanings in tax law applications.