Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 1993 (6) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1993 (6) TMI 240 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Issues Involved:
1. Whether "cast iron castings" are covered by the term "cast iron" under item 2(i) of the Third Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.
2. Whether the turnovers relating to the sales of "cast iron castings" are taxable under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957.
3. The binding nature of the Government Order (G.O. Ms. No. 383) and clarifications issued by the Government of India on the taxability of "cast iron castings".
4. The distinction between rough castings and finished products for tax purposes.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Whether "cast iron castings" are covered by the term "cast iron" under item 2(i) of the Third Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957:
The Tribunal initially held that "cast iron castings" are commercially the same as "cast iron" and thus covered under item 2(i) of the Third Schedule to the Act. This was based on the Government Order (G.O. Ms. No. 383) and clarifications from the Government of India, which stated that "cast iron castings" were included in the term "cast iron". However, the High Court examined the nature of "cast iron" and "cast iron castings" and concluded that the term "cast iron" in item 2(i) refers to iron in its primary form, such as rough castings, and not to any subsequently fabricated forms or finished products. The Court emphasized that "cast iron" in its primary form includes rough castings but does not extend to distinct commercial commodities made from cast iron.

2. Whether the turnovers relating to the sales of "cast iron castings" are taxable under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957:
The Tribunal had exempted the turnovers relating to "cast iron castings" from tax, treating them as second sales of tax-paid goods. However, the High Court noted that the Tribunal did not investigate whether the goods sold were rough castings or finished products. The Court held that rough castings, which are not distinct commercial commodities, could be considered "cast iron" and thus exempt from further tax. In contrast, finished products or distinct commercial commodities made from cast iron are taxable. The Court remitted the cases back to the Tribunal for a detailed examination of the nature of the goods sold by the assessees.

3. The binding nature of the Government Order (G.O. Ms. No. 383) and clarifications issued by the Government of India on the taxability of "cast iron castings":
The Tribunal relied heavily on G.O. Ms. No. 383 and clarifications from the Government of India, which stated that "cast iron castings" were covered within the term "cast iron". The High Court acknowledged that such clarifications are relevant and should be given due weight. However, it emphasized that these clarifications should be interpreted in the context of the statutory provisions. The Court noted that the clarifications did not explicitly define the scope of "cast iron castings" and that the term should not be extended to include finished products or distinct commercial commodities.

4. The distinction between rough castings and finished products for tax purposes:
The High Court clarified that rough castings, which are primary forms of cast iron, could be considered "cast iron" and thus exempt from further tax if they have already suffered tax. However, finished products or distinct commercial commodities made from cast iron, such as C.I. pipes, manhole covers, and machine parts, are not covered by the term "cast iron" and are taxable. The Court directed the Tribunal to investigate whether the goods sold by the assessees were rough castings or finished products and to make a determination based on this distinction.

Conclusion:
The High Court set aside the Tribunal's orders and remitted the matters back to the Tribunal for a detailed examination of the nature and character of the goods involved. The Court emphasized that only rough castings, which are not distinct commercial commodities, could be considered "cast iron" and exempt from further tax, while finished products or distinct commercial commodities made from cast iron are taxable. The Tribunal was directed to give reasonable time to the assessees to present additional material to substantiate their cases.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates