9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Interpretation of the Amnesty Scheme regarding the filing of revised returns after a search operation.
Analysis: The High Court of Kerala dealt with two groups of Income Tax References (I.T.Rs) related to consecutive assessment years of the same assessee. The main issue raised was whether the revised return filed by the assessee after a search operation should be considered as a return under the Amnesty Scheme. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal referred questions regarding this issue for the court's opinion. In the submission before the court, it was argued that the return filed after the search operation should not be considered for the Amnesty Scheme benefits. The Revenue contended that the return filed post-search was not bona fide and should not be accepted for the scheme. However, the Appellate Tribunal disagreed, stating that the return was filed under compelling circumstances to save from the consequences of the search operation. The court referred to a previous judgment in CWT v. N. C. J. John, where it was held that the Amnesty Scheme should not be narrowly interpreted to exclude assessees who underwent a search operation without any concealment detection. The court emphasized interpreting the scheme rationally to avoid unjust outcomes and revenue loss to the Department. The court noted that the Appellate Tribunal did not analyze the matter in line with the guidelines set in the N. C. J. John case. Therefore, the court set aside the Tribunal's orders and remanded the case back for fresh consideration, directing the Tribunal to take into account the observations made in the N. C. J. John judgment. In conclusion, the High Court of Kerala set aside the Appellate Tribunal's orders on the questions related to the revised return filed under the Amnesty Scheme post-search operation. The case was remanded to the Tribunal for fresh orders considering the court's guidelines from the N. C. J. John judgment.
|
