Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1998 (2) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1998 (2) TMI 52 - HC - Income Tax

Issues: Valuation of shares under break-up value method, entitlement to discount of 30% on share value, application of Wealth-tax Rules, consideration of dividend declaration in determining discount percentage.

Analysis:
The judgment concerns the valuation of shares under the break-up value method and the entitlement to a 30% discount on the share value. The assessee gifted shares in two companies during the relevant assessment year, and the Gift-tax Officer initially valued the shares based on the balance-sheet as on March 31, 1973. However, subsequent appeals led to a determination that the balance-sheet as of March 31, 1973, should be considered for valuation. The Appellate Tribunal, following previous orders, allowed a 30% discount on the share value to determine the taxable value of the gifted shares.

The main contention arose regarding the application of Wealth-tax Rules in determining the discount percentage. The Revenue argued that the rules allowed only a 15% discount, while the assessee claimed entitlement to a 30% discount. The Tribunal's decision to grant a 30% discount was supported by references to earlier judgments affirming similar discounts in comparable cases. However, the court noted discrepancies in the Tribunal's reasoning, as it failed to provide clear evidence of dividend declarations or how the discount percentage was justified based on the facts of the case.

The court emphasized the importance of considering dividend declarations and the gradual increase in discount percentages allowed under the Wealth-tax Rules. It highlighted the lack of clarity in the Tribunal's decision-making process and directed a re-evaluation of the discount percentage based on concrete evidence and adherence to relevant precedents. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, subject to the Tribunal's reconsideration of the discount percentage in light of additional evidence that may be presented during the appeal hearing. No costs were awarded in the case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates