Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + SC Customs - 1998 (7) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1998 (7) TMI 681 - SC - Customs


Issues:
1. Whether P.V.C. Resins in powder form fall under plastic and plastic goods for Octroi duty levy.
2. Whether Synthetic Hydrocarbon resin is considered as Plastic and plastic goods for Octroi duty levy.

Issue 1: P.V.C. Resins in powder form classification for Octroi duty levy:

The appeals revolve around the classification of P.V.C. Resins in powder form for Octroi duty levy under the relevant rules. The High Court held that P.V.C. Resins do not fall under "plastic" but under "chemicals." The respondents argued that P.V.C. Resins are not plastic goods as they are used as ingredients in manufacturing plastic goods and do not meet the criteria for plastic. They contended that P.V.C. Resins are polymers synthesized for adhesive use, distinct from plastic, and should not be subject to Octroi duty under the specific entry for plastic goods. The Supreme Court analyzed the technical details and commercial understanding of the term "plastic" and concluded that P.V.C. Resins in powder form should be classified separately under the relevant rules, not as plastic goods. The Court allowed the appeals filed by the Municipal Corporation and Municipal Council, setting aside the High Court's decision.

Issue 2: Classification of Synthetic Hydrocarbon resin for Octroi duty levy:

The second set of appeals concerned the classification of Synthetic Hydrocarbon resin for Octroi duty levy under the Municipal Corporation Act. The respondents argued that Synthetic Hydrocarbon resin should not be considered as plastic goods for Octroi duty purposes. They contended that Hydrocarbon resin is distinct from plastic and should be treated as a separate category. The Supreme Court analyzed the technical distinctions between resin and plastic, noting that the commercial understanding of the term "plastic" includes various forms of plastic material. The Court held that Hydrocarbon resin should be treated similarly to synthetic plastic and not as a separate category. Therefore, the Court rejected the argument that Hydrocarbon resin is distinct from plastic and upheld the classification of Synthetic Hydrocarbon resin under the relevant Octroi duty entry. The appeals filed by the Municipal Corporation and Municipal Council were allowed, overturning the High Court's decision.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court clarified the classification of P.V.C. Resins in powder form and Synthetic Hydrocarbon resin for Octroi duty levy, emphasizing the commercial understanding and technical aspects of the materials. The Court ruled in favor of the Municipal Corporation and Municipal Council, setting aside the High Court's judgment and upholding the classification of the goods under the specific Octroi duty entries.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates