9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Assessment of concealed income by Income-tax Officer. 2. Appeal to Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and subsequent penalty reduction. 3. Appeal to Income-tax Appellate Tribunal leading to setting aside of previous orders. 4. Criminal complaint by Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax. 5. Petition to quash the criminal proceedings. Analysis: The petitioner, a contractor and income-tax assessee, initially declared an income of Rs. 54,730 for the assessment year 1985-86. However, a search under section 132 of the Income-tax Act revealed alleged suppression of income and unaccounted bank deposits. The Income-tax Officer assessed the total income at Rs. 3,95,300, including concealed income, undervaluation of work-in-progress, and unaccounted remittances, imposing a penalty of Rs. 2 lakhs. Subsequent appeals to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal resulted in the penalty being reduced to Rs. 1,35,805, with the Tribunal setting aside the previous orders and allowing the assessee to approach the Settlement Commission for dispute resolution. Amidst these proceedings, the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax filed a criminal complaint against the petitioner, alleging false income-tax return filing and attempted tax evasion. The petitioner sought to quash the criminal proceedings, arguing that the foundation for the complaint, based on the Commissioner's order, had been invalidated by the Tribunal's decision. The petitioner relied on precedents to support the quashing of criminal proceedings in similar circumstances, emphasizing the need for a nexus between the evasion quantum and prosecution under relevant sections of the Act. The court considered the timing of events, noting the delay in filing the criminal complaint after the assessment order and the subsequent reversal of decisions by the Tribunal. Citing previous rulings, the court found merit in quashing the proceedings, emphasizing that the prosecution was linked to the assessment findings. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashing the criminal proceedings without barring the Department from initiating fresh complaints if necessary following settlement outcomes. In conclusion, the judgment addressed the assessment of concealed income, subsequent appeals, criminal complaint, and the petition to quash the proceedings. It highlighted the importance of the Tribunal's decision in influencing the criminal prosecution, ultimately leading to the quashing of the proceedings while preserving the Department's right to pursue alternative actions based on settlement results.
|
