9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (9) TMI 904 - HC - VAT and Sales TaxRestoration of appeal - Appeal dismissed for non compliance of pre deposit order - Held that - It is apparent that the second appeal preferred by the petitioner before the Tribunal came to be dismissed for non-payment of the predeposit amount of tax as well as interest. Subsequently, the petitioner has deposited the entire pre-deposit amount as directed by the Tribunal. Under the circumstances, the interests of justice would best be served, if the appeal preferred by the petitioner before the Tribunal is restored. - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues:
1. Appeal against the order of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal dismissed due to non-payment of pre-deposit amount. 2. Petitioner deposited the entire pre-deposit amount subsequently and sought restoration of the appeal. Analysis: Issue 1: The petitioner filed an appeal against the order of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal, which was dismissed for non-payment of the pre-deposit amount. The Tribunal's decision was challenged in the High Court. The petitioner argued that they have now deposited the entire pre-deposit amount of tax and interest. The Assistant Government Pleader pointed out that the Tribunal failed to recognize that the order of the appellate authority was on merits. However, considering the petitioner's compliance with the pre-deposit requirement, it was suggested that the appeal should be restored. Issue 2: The High Court observed that the petitioner had indeed deposited the entire pre-deposit amount as directed by the Tribunal after the dismissal of the appeal. Acknowledging this compliance and in the interest of justice, the Court allowed the petition, quashed the Tribunal's order, and restored the appeal to the Tribunal for a decision on merits in accordance with the law. The Court made the rule absolute with no order as to costs. Additionally, a related civil application was disposed of in light of the main petition's order. In conclusion, the High Court granted the petitioner's request for restoration of the appeal after the pre-deposit amount was paid, emphasizing the importance of compliance with procedural requirements and ensuring justice is served in tax-related matters.
|
