Home
Issues Involved:
The issue in this case is whether the notice to the assessee u/s 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was issued within the prescribed time limit. Summary: Issue 1: Time Limit for Issuing Notice u/s 147/148 The proviso to section 147 of the Act states that no action shall be taken after four years from the end of the relevant assessment year unless certain conditions are met, including failure to disclose material facts. In this case, for the assessment year 1992-93, the four-year period would expire on 31-3-1997. The Assessing Officer recorded the reasons for reopening on 4-11-1997 and issued the notice on 20-11-1997. The Tribunal found that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment. The Tribunal concluded that the action under section 147/148 was barred by limitation, similar to a previous order for the assessment year 1994-95. Issue 2: Conclusion of the Tribunal The Court considered the Tribunal's decision as a pure question of fact and found no perversity in the conclusion reached. It was noted that there was no substantial question of law arising in the appeal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal u/s 260(A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Therefore, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the notice issued to the assessee u/s 147/148 was beyond the prescribed time limit, as there was no failure to disclose material facts, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.
|