9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Appeal filed u/s 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajkot regarding deductions u/s 80-HH & 80-I and manufacturing activity eligibility for deductions.
Deductions under Section 80-HH & 80-I: The respondent, engaged in ship breaking, claimed deductions under Sections 80-HH and 80-I from gross profit. The Assessing Officer allowed deduction under Section 80-I from residual income after deduction u/s 80-HH. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed deduction under Section 80-I from gross profit, upheld by the Tribunal citing a decision of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The Tribunal also directed the Assessing Officer to grant deductions for manufacturing activity, which was affirmed by the High Court based on Supreme Court decisions. The High Court held that deductions could be claimed on gross income u/s 80A and ship breaking qualifies for deductions u/s 80HH and 80-I. Manufacturing Activity Eligibility for Deductions: The Assessing Officer initially denied deductions u/s 80HH and 80-I for ship breaking activity, stating it did not amount to manufacturing. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, considering ship breaking as a manufacturing activity based on Supreme Court precedent. The High Court upheld this decision, allowing the deductions under Sections 80HH and 80-I of the Act for the respondent. Conclusion: The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal in favor of the respondent. The Court relied on Supreme Court judgments to support the eligibility of deductions under Sections 80-HH and 80-I for ship breaking activities and clarified that deductions should be claimed on gross income, not after allowing deductions under Section 80HH of the Act.
|
