Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2014 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (5) TMI 1057 - AT - Customs


Issues: Classification of imported goods under Customs Tariff Headings 8708 91 00, 7608 10 00, and 8501 10 19.

Classification under CTH 8708 91 00:
The judgment analyzed the classification of imported goods under CTH 8708 91 00, which pertains to "parts and accessories of motor vehicles." It was emphasized that for goods to fall under this classification, they must be established as parts and accessories of motor vehicles under specific headings. The burden of proof lies with the Revenue to demonstrate that the imported goods qualify under this category. However, the record lacked evidence supporting this, leading to the Revenue's failure to discharge its burden. As a result, the appellant's claim regarding the classification of goods under CTH 8708 91 00 was upheld.

Classification under CTH 7608 10 00:
Regarding the classification of aluminium square tubes, the appellant contended that they should be classified under CTH 7608 10 00, which covers the "product of aluminium tubes and pipes." The judgment acknowledged the appellant's argument and supported the classification of the aluminium square tubes under this specific category. The reasoning behind this decision was based on the description and nature of the goods, aligning with the criteria set forth under CTH 7608 10 00.

Classification under CTH 8501 10 19:
The judgment also addressed the classification of fan motors under CTH 8501 10 19, which deals with "electric motors and generators." The appellant argued that the characteristics of the goods corresponded to this classification. It was noted that the show cause notice did not provide evidence that the fan motors were accessories or parts of motor vehicles under specific headings. Without a physical examination report supporting the Revenue's claim, the judgment found the Revenue's argument lacking in establishing the classification of the fan motors under CTH 8708 91 00. Consequently, the claim of the Revenue was deemed unsuccessful, and the appellant's position on the classification of fan motors under CTH 8501 10 19 was upheld.

In conclusion, the appeal was allowed based on the analysis and findings related to the classification of the imported goods under Customs Tariff Headings 8708 91 00, 7608 10 00, and 8501 10 19. The judgment highlighted the importance of providing substantial evidence to support the classification of goods under specific tariff headings and emphasized the burden of proof on the Revenue in such cases.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates