9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Appeal against deletion of addition of miscellaneous expenses treated as capital in nature and disallowance of legal and professional fee and integration fee.
Miscellaneous expenses treated as capital in nature: The assessee filed a return declaring a loss and was selected for scrutiny. The Assessing Officer disallowed a sum towards miscellaneous expenses as capital in nature, despite the assessee claiming it as deferred revenue expenditure. The ld. CIT(A) allowed the claim based on similar precedent from a previous year, where the expenses were treated as deferred revenue. The Tribunal upheld the ld. CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that deferred revenue expenditure is an accounting concept and not recognized under the Income-tax Act. The benefits derived from such expenditure are expected over time, justifying the amortization of expenses. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's appeal as no tangible asset was created by the assessee. Legal and professional fee and integration fee: The AO disallowed certain expenses on the grounds of liability not being crystallized. The ld. CIT(A) allowed the claim after reviewing the details of bills, which showed normal business expenditure incurred within the relevant year. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal as no material was presented to challenge the ld. CIT(A)'s findings. The expenses were considered legitimate business expenditures, and without any contradictory evidence, the Tribunal saw no reason to interfere. Additional ground: No additional ground was raised during the appeal, leading to its dismissal. In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the decisions of the ld. CIT(A) regarding the deletion of the addition of miscellaneous expenses and the allowance of legal and professional fee and integration fee. The appeal was dismissed.
|
