9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (8) TMI 1007 - AT - Income TaxDisallowance u/s 14A - Held that - The balance sheet of the assessee shows that it has interest free funds amounting to ₹ 14,88,38,332/-, the investment is at ₹ 9,71,56,751/-, which clearly shows that the assessee was having sufficient interest free funds to make the investment. A further perusal of the balance sheet shows that the assessee was having loan funds as on 31/03/2007 at ₹ 33,29,48,063/- whereas the loan funds as on 31/03/2008 is at ₹ 1,36,00,000/-, which shows that there is a substantial fall in the loan funds which means that there are no fresh borrowings during the year under consideration. See Reliance Utilities and Power Ltd 2009 (1) TMI 4 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY Thus in our considered view, there is no basis for deeming that the assessee had used the borrowed funds for investments in tax free securities. From the analysis of the balance sheet, the assessee had enough interest free funds at its disposal for making its investment. We therefore set-aside the findings of the CIT(A) and direct the AO to delete the addition made u/s 14A of the Act. - Decided in favour of assessee
Issues: Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act
Analysis: The appeal pertains to the disallowance of &8377; 88,84,319/- under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the assessee, engaged in financial services and securities, had both exempt and taxable income along with investments and business assets. The AO required the assessee to justify why disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D should not be made. The assessee contended that it had adequate interest-free funds exceeding the investments, citing the decision of the Bombay High Court in Reliance Utilities and Power Ltd. However, the AO disagreed, insisting that the assessee must demonstrate the availability of interest-free funds at the time of investment. Consequently, the AO computed the disallowance at &8377; 90,04,319/-, adding &8377; 88,84,319/- to the assessee's income, a decision upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]. During the appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), the assessee's counsel emphasized the substantial interest-free funds held by the assessee, referencing the Reliance Utilities and Power Ltd. case and the HDFC Bank Ltd. case. The Tribunal examined the balance sheet, revealing interest-free funds of &8377; 14,88,38,332/- against investments of &8377; 9,71,56,751/-. Notably, there was a significant reduction in loan funds from the previous year, indicating no fresh borrowings. Relying on the decisions of the Bombay High Court and the favorable financial position of the assessee, the Tribunal held that the assessee possessed adequate interest-free funds to support its investments. Consequently, the Tribunal overturned the CIT(A)'s decision and directed the AO to delete the disallowance of &8377; 88,84,319/- under section 14A of the Act. In conclusion, the ITAT allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, emphasizing the sufficiency of interest-free funds to cover the investments and rejecting the presumption of borrowed funds being utilized for tax-free securities. The Tribunal's decision was based on a detailed analysis of the financial position and legal precedents, ultimately leading to the deletion of the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
|
