Home
Issues involved: Dispute regarding measurement of distance for agricultural land u/s 2(14)(iii)(b) of the Income-tax Act.
Details of the judgment: - The dispute in the appeal was about the measurement of distance for determining if the land is agricultural or a capital asset. - The Assessing Officer considered the Arial distance, while the assessee argued for measuring distance through the approach road. - The CIT(A) referred to a decision of the Punjab & Haryana High Court and directed the AO to consider the case accordingly. - The ITAT considered various case laws and upheld the CIT(A)'s decision based on the Punjab & Haryana High Court's ruling. - The ITAT set aside the AO's order and directed to determine the distance from municipal limits by adopting the method as per previous Tribunal orders. - The ITAT confirmed the CIT(A)'s order and dismissed the Revenue's appeal based on the co-ordinate Bench's decision and the Punjab & Haryana High Court's ruling. Conclusion: The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision regarding the measurement of distance for agricultural land, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
|