9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Appeal filed by Revenue regarding deduction claimed by assessee u/s.80-IA of Income Tax Act, 1961 and disallowance made by Assessing Officer u/s.40(a)(i) of the Act.
Deduction u/s.80-IA: The Revenue contested the direction of the Commissioner of Income Tax(A) to rework the deduction claimed by assessee u/s.80-IA without setting off losses on a notional basis. The jurisdictional High Court's decision in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills Ltd. was cited, emphasizing the provisions of sub-sections (1), (2), and (5) of Section 80-IA. The Tribunal concluded that the deduction is allowed for eligible businesses for ten consecutive assessment years, and losses set off against other income cannot be brought forward notionally. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing Revenue's appeal on this ground. Disallowance u/s.40(a)(i): The Revenue challenged the deletion of disallowance made by the Assessing Officer u/s.40(a)(i) of the Act concerning non-deduction of tax at source on agency commission paid to non-residents. The amendment to Sec.9(1) of the Act was highlighted, but the Tribunal noted that the overseas agents had no permanent establishment in India and the payments were for services rendered outside India. The Tribunal found that the assessee's failure to deduct tax was based on a bona fide belief that the non-residents' income was not taxable in India. Referring to the decision in GE India Technology Centre Pvt Ltd case, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the disallowance, dismissing Revenue's appeal on this ground. In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on both grounds, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.
|
