9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved: The judgment involves appeals by the Revenue for assessment years 2001-2002, 2002-2003, and 2003-2004, along with a Cross Objection (CO) by the assessee for the assessment year 2001-2002, all directed against the orders of the CIT(A).
ITA No.562/Ahd/2008 (A.Y.2001-2002) Revenue's Appeal: The Revenue's appeal contested the deletion of a specific amount from the total addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as peak credit. The CIT(A) upheld the deletion, finding that the credit entries in the bank account were explained, particularly a significant deposit from a known source. The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. CO No.74/Ahd/2008 - A.Y.2001-2002 (Assessee's CO): The assessee raised objections regarding the legality and service of notice proceedings under section 147 and the erroneous nature of the notice under Section 148. However, since the Revenue's appeal for the same assessment year was dismissed, the CO of the assessee was also dismissed. ITA Nos.1510, 1511, and 1512/Ahd/2008 for A.Y.2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003-2004 (Revenue's Appeals): The Revenue's appeals for these assessment years raised similar issues regarding unexplained cash credits in bank accounts. The CIT(A) provided a detailed order, considering reports from the AO and submissions from the assessee. The CIT(A) found that the deposits were adequately explained, including transfers from other accounts, and noted inconsistencies in the AO's approach. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s orders for all three assessment years, dismissing the Revenue's appeals. In conclusion, all appeals by the Revenue and the CO of the assessee were dismissed based on the detailed analysis and findings provided in the orders of the CIT(A) and the Tribunal.
|
