9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The judgment involves the assessment years 2001-02 to 2003-04, focusing on the re-opening of assessments and the treatment of godowns let out by the assessee for wealth tax purposes.
Re-opening of assessments: The appellant disputed the re-opening of assessments by the Assessing Officer u/s 17 of the Wealth Tax Act based on objections raised by the Audit Department. The appellant argued that re-assessment proceedings couldn't be initiated solely on these objections. However, as the appellant had not filed a wealth tax return for the relevant years, the Assessing Officer's actions were deemed valid. The Tribunal upheld the initiation of re-assessment proceedings, citing that the net wealth exceeded the non-taxable limit, thus rejecting the appellant's grounds of appeal for the assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03. Treatment of let-out godowns: The question arose whether the godowns let out by the assessee should be included in the net wealth for wealth tax assessment. The appellant had ceased its manufacturing business and rented out the godowns. The Tribunal considered the definition of assets u/s 2(ea) of the Act, which excludes properties in the nature of commercial establishments or complexes from being chargeable to wealth tax. Referring to precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the let-out godowns, being commercial establishments, should be excluded as assets for wealth tax computation. The Tribunal allowed the grounds of appeal for the assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03, as well as for 2003-04, vacating the decisions of the lower authorities. Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2001-02 and 2002-03 in part and fully allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2003-04, based on the valid initiation of re-assessment proceedings and the exclusion of let-out godowns as assets for wealth tax calculation.
|
