Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2011 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (5) TMI 993 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved: Appeal against deletion of addition of share application money u/s 68 for assessment year 2002-03.

Summary:

1. Addition of Share Application Money:
The revenue appealed against the deletion of the addition of Rs. 10,20,000 made by the Assessing Officer under sec. 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The revenue contended that the assessee failed to explain the share application money and the commission incurred for arranging this accommodation entry. The assessee received Rs. 10 lacs from four concerns, and the Assessing Officer reopened the assessment based on information received from the Investigation Wing.

2. Reassessment Proceedings:
The Assessing Officer directed the assessee to prove the identity of the applicants, their creditworthiness, and the genuineness of the transactions. Despite the assessee providing confirmation, PAN, and bank statements, the Assessing Officer relied on a statement from Shri Mahesh Garg, a person involved in accommodation entries business, to make the addition and estimate an expenditure for arranging such entries.

3. Appeal before CIT(Appeals):
The assessee challenged the reopening of the assessment and the additions on merit before the CIT(Appeals). The assessee submitted various documents to substantiate the genuineness of the share application money received. The CIT(Appeals) examined the facts and circumstances and deleted the addition based on the evidence presented.

4. Tribunal's Decision:
Upon careful review of the record, the Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer gave more weight to Shri Mahesh Garg's statement than the documentary evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that the statement was not recorded in the assessment proceedings of the assessee and Shri Mahesh Garg was not associated with the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)' decision to delete the addition, as the documentary evidence fulfilled the conditions required by sec. 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

5. Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, affirming the decision of the CIT(Appeals) to delete the addition of share application money. The decision was pronounced in the open court on 20.05.2011.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates