9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Justification of the Tribunal's decision to grant exemption for payments received in lieu of leave encashment while in service. 2. Applicability of the amendment to section 10(10AA) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, retrospectively from the assessment year 1978-79. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Justification of the Tribunal's decision to grant exemption for payments received in lieu of leave encashment while in service: The Tribunal had concurred with the Appellate Assistant Commissioner in granting exemption for the leave encashment payments received by the assessee while in service, under section 10(10AA) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Income-tax Officer had treated the leave encashment as part of the assessee's salary income under sections 15 and 17 of the Act, rejecting the exemption claim. The Tribunal's decision was based on the interpretation that the phrase "or otherwise" in section 10(10AA) extended the exemption to payments received during the employment period, not just upon retirement. However, the High Court disagreed with this interpretation. It was argued by the Department that section 10(10AA) should only exempt sums received at the time of retirement or superannuation. Referring to a circular from the Central Board of Direct Taxes and the Andhra Pradesh High Court ruling in M. Krishna Murthy v. CIT, the High Court emphasized that "profits in lieu of salary" include leave encashment amounts, making them taxable under section 17(3)(ii) of the Act. The High Court clarified that the term "salary" as defined in section 17 includes payments for leave not availed of, and the exemption under section 10(10AA) is specifically for retirement-related payments. The phrase "or otherwise" was interpreted to cover only scenarios involving severance of employment, not ongoing employment. 2. Applicability of the amendment to section 10(10AA) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, retrospectively from the assessment year 1978-79: The amendment to section 10(10AA) by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, was given retrospective effect from April 1, 1978. This amendment clarified that the exemption applies only to payments received upon retirement, whether on superannuation or otherwise. The High Court noted that this legislative change was intended to limit the exemption to retirement-related payments, aligning with the legislative intent to provide limited relief to retiring employees. The High Court referred to the legislative history and a circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, which indicated that the amendment aimed to prevent claims for exemption on leave encashment received during service. The combined effect of the amendments to sections 17 and 10(10AA) was to ensure that only retirement-related leave encashment payments qualify for exemption. Conclusion: The High Court concluded that the Tribunal's interpretation of section 10(10AA) was incorrect. The exemption for leave encashment payments applies only to amounts received upon retirement or severance of employment, not during ongoing employment. The retrospective amendment to section 10(10AA) reinforced this interpretation. Consequently, the High Court answered the referred questions in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee, denying the exemption for leave encashment payments received while in service.
|
