1996 (1) TMI 57 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues involved: Determination of whether the activities of the assessee constitute a "business" u/s 2(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and entitlement to deduction of a specific sum from total income for a particular assessment year.

Issue 1 - Activities as Business:
The primary issue is whether the activities of the respondent/assessee, involving acquiring, maintaining, training, and racing horses, qualify as a "business" as per the definition u/s 2(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Revenue argued that the income or loss should fall under "Income from other sources," while the assessee claimed it should be categorized as "Profits and gains of business or profession." The Tribunal found that the assessee's activities constituted a continuous course of business activity, conducted with a profit motive, based on the nature of the activities and financial aspects.

Issue 2 - Deduction Claim:
The second issue pertains to the deduction claimed by the assessee for losses incurred in the assessment year 1972-73. The assessee sought deductions u/s 36(1)(vi) for unusable horses and general losses related to the racing activities, totaling Rs. 60,779. The Tribunal supported the assessee's claim, emphasizing the business nature of the activities and the profit motive behind them.

Legal Analysis:
The definition of "business" under the Act includes any trade, commerce, or manufacture conducted with a profit motive. Previous decisions highlighted the need for a continuous course of activity with a profit motive to classify an endeavor as a business. The Tribunal's findings indicated that the assessee's racing activities fulfilled these criteria, leading to the conclusion that the activities constituted a business. Contrary decisions cited by the Revenue were deemed distinguishable as they did not align with the specific circumstances of the present case.

Conclusion:
The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming that the activities in question qualified as a business under the Income-tax Act, 1961. The questions posed were answered in the affirmative, rejecting the Revenue's contentions. The judgment emphasized the continuous nature of the activities and the profit motive behind them, supporting the assessee's claim for deductions.