9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Compensation determination based on land acquisition valuation principles. Analysis: The Supreme Court judgment pertains to a land acquisition case where the Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was published in 1960 for establishing an orphanage in Gujarat. The Land Acquisition Collector initially awarded compensation at the rate of Rs. 1.25 per sq. yard, which was disputed by the appellants. The Civil Court later determined the compensation at Rs. 2.05 per sq. yard, and the Gujarat High Court, on appeal, set the compensation at Rs. 4 per sq. yard after a 60% deduction from the market value of Rs. 10 per sq. yard. The appellants challenged this deduction, arguing that the High Court's reasoning was fallacious and legally unsustainable. They contended that the market value was higher based on comparable sales transactions and that the restrictive conditions for future development should not affect the valuation. The appellant's counsel argued against the deduction, emphasizing that the High Court's decision was not justified as it did not consider all relevant factors, such as the potential value of the land and the prevailing market conditions. The State's counsel opposed this argument, supporting the High Court's deduction based on factors like the land's location, potential restrictions on development, and the vast extent of the acquired land. The Supreme Court analyzed the principles guiding land valuation in such cases, emphasizing the need to consider all relevant circumstances, evidence, and legal principles to determine the just and fair market value. The Court highlighted that the size and location of the land, potential use for building purposes, and the comparability of sales instances are crucial in valuation. Referring to previous judgments, the Court established that sales of small lands are not directly comparable to valuing large extents of land, especially if the latter can be used for building purposes. The Court also noted that necessary deductions for roads, civic amenities, and potential development charges should be factored in during valuation. In this specific case, the Court found that the High Court's deduction of 60% was justified, considering the land's location, potential restrictions, and the risk associated with purchasing such a large extent of land. Ultimately, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's compensation determination at Rs. 4 per sq. yard, without awarding costs to either party.
|
