Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2006 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (7) TMI 694 - AT - Service Tax

Issues:
1. Imposition of interest and penalty for non-transfer of Service Tax deposited by the appellants to the Commissioner, Service Tax.

Analysis:
The appeal in question arises from an Order-in-Appeal where interest and penalty were imposed on the appellants for not transferring the Service Tax deposited to the Commissioner, Service Tax. The appellants argued that they followed the rules outlined in the P and T Financial Hand Book and Telecom Manual, and there was no delay in depositing the tax as they were to recover it from their customers and deposit it accordingly.

The counsel for the appellants highlighted that a similar issue had been decided in their favor in a previous case by the President's Bench, where it was held that the delay in transferring the amount was due to accounting problems and not the fault of the appellants. The Bench accepted the appeal based on the ratio of the previous judgment, setting aside the penalty and interest.

Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal noted that the issue was covered in the assessee's favor by the cited judgment in their own case. It was established that there was no delay in depositing the amounts by the assessee as per the rules, and any delay in transfer was not their fault. Consequently, the impugned order imposing penalty and interest was set aside based on the cited judgment. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the imposition of penalty and interest as there was no fault on their part regarding the transfer of the Service Tax amounts, as established by the previous judgments in their own case.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates