9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Applicability of Section 33(1)(o) of the Estate Duty Act in conjunction with Section 10. 2. Application of Section 33(1)(o) to gifts made prior to its insertion in the Estate Duty Act. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Applicability of Section 33(1)(o) of the Estate Duty Act in Conjunction with Section 10 The primary issue revolves around whether Section 33(1)(o) of the Estate Duty Act can be applied to gifts that fall under the purview of Section 10 of the same Act. The case involves a gift made by Kunchithapatham to his son on April 4, 1963, and Kunchithapatham's subsequent death on October 5, 1974. The Assistant Controller assessed that Kunchithapatham continued to possess and enjoy the gifted property until his death, thereby invoking Section 10 to tax the value of the property. The Appellate Controller agreed that Section 10 was applicable but held that the gift, being made more than five years before the deceased's death, was exempt under Section 33(1)(o). The Tribunal upheld this view, stating, "Section 10 would be applicable, but by virtue of Section 33(1)(o) such gifts are exempt." The court analyzed the provisions, noting that Section 10 creates a presumption that gifts where the donor retains possession or benefits pass on the donor's death. However, Section 33(1)(o) provides an exemption for gifts made to close relatives beyond five years before the donor's death. The court concluded that "Section 10 cannot have an overriding effect" and that Section 33(1)(o) exempts such gifts from estate duty. Issue 2: Application of Section 33(1)(o) to Gifts Made Prior to Its Insertion in the Estate Duty Act The second issue concerns whether Section 33(1)(o) can be applied to gifts made before its insertion on April 1, 1965. The gift in question was made in 1963, and the deceased passed away in 1974. The Revenue argued that since the gift was made before the insertion of Section 33(1)(o), it should not be exempt. The court examined the legislative intent and the specific wording of the proviso to Section 33(1)(o), which states that no estate duty shall be payable on property taken under a gift to close relatives beyond five years before the donor's death, provided it is chargeable to gift-tax or exempt under Section 5 of the Gift-tax Act for any assessment year after March 31, 1964. The court highlighted that the exemption applies if the gift was made beyond five years before the donor's death, irrespective of the date of the gift's execution. The court stated, "It is obvious, the property taken under any gift beyond a period of five years must mean beyond a period of five years prior to the death of the deceased and that period may be prior to April 1, 1965, the date with effect from which this provision is introduced in the Act." The court rejected the Revenue's contention, noting that accepting their interpretation would render the proviso inoperative for five years and deny exemptions for gifts made before April 1, 1965. The court concluded that the Tribunal correctly applied Section 33(1)(o) to the gift made in 1963, as it was beyond five years of the deceased's death in 1974. Conclusion The court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming that Section 33(1)(o) exempts gifts made to close relatives beyond five years before the donor's death, even if the gift was made before the section's insertion in the Act. Both questions were answered in favor of the assessee, and no costs were awarded.
|
