9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Assessment of income from trust properties in the hands of the assessee or the beneficiaries.
Detailed Analysis: The case involves a trust constituted under a deed dated August 14, 1951, with five trustees appointed to manage certain properties for the benefit of the Chemists and Druggists Association. The Income-tax Officer initially denied exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, stating the trust was not for the benefit of the public. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner directed the income from properties to be assessed in the hands of the association, not the trust. The Department appealed to the Appellate Tribunal, which upheld the Commissioner's decision. The Department argued that the trust deed vested legal title in the trust, making it improper to assess income in the association's hands. The properties were purchased by the trustees and dedicated to the association under the trust deed. The excess income could be used for various purposes, including the benefit of the trustees. The Department contended that the Tribunal erred in directing the assessment on the association. On the other hand, the assessee's counsel supported the Tribunal's decision, stating that the association was the sole beneficiary, and the trustees managed the properties. Alternatively, if the assessment was on the trust, the income could be assessed in the beneficiaries' hands. The trust deed clearly outlined the legal title vested in the trust, not the association, indicating that income should be assessed in the trust's hands. The High Court analyzed the trust deed clauses, confirming that legal title resided with the trust, not the association. Therefore, the income from the properties should be assessed in the trust's hands. The Tribunal's direction to assess in the association's hands was deemed incorrect. The Court directed the Tribunal to assess the income from the properties in the hands of the trust, to be further assessed in the beneficiaries' hands. The Court ruled in favor of the Department, with no costs awarded and fixed counsel's fee at Rs. 1,000.
|
