Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2005 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2005 (4) TMI 609 - HC - Indian Laws

Issues:
1. Validity of Insolvency Notice under Section 9 (2) of Presidency Towns Insolvency Act.
2. Enforceability of arbitral award as a decree for insolvency proceedings.

Issue 1 - Validity of Insolvency Notice:
The case involved an appeal against an order directing debtors to pay a sum due to a petitioning creditor. The petitioning creditor sought insolvency proceedings under Section 9 (2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act based on an arbitral award that the debtors failed to comply with. The debtors contended that the award was not a decree and thus insolvency proceedings were not maintainable. However, the court held that the award had reached finality and could be enforced under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act as if it were a decree. Therefore, the Insolvency Notice was deemed valid under the relevant provisions.

Issue 2 - Enforceability of Arbitral Award:
The debtors argued that an arbitral award should not be considered a decree for insolvency purposes. They relied on a previous Bombay High Court decision but the court disagreed, citing that once an arbitral award becomes final and binding, it can be enforced as a decree under the Code of Civil Procedure. The court emphasized that the substance of the matter, not just the form, should guide the enforcement of arbitral awards. Consequently, the court upheld the validity of the Insolvency Notice based on the final and binding nature of the arbitral award, directing the debtors to pay the outstanding amount. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.

In conclusion, the court affirmed the validity of the Insolvency Notice issued under Section 9 (2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act based on the enforceability of the arbitral award as a decree. The court held that the debtors' failure to pay despite the finality of the award justified the imposition of payment conditions. The decision highlighted the binding nature of arbitral awards and their equivalence to decrees for enforcement purposes in insolvency proceedings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates