9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of deduction under section 80C of the Income-tax Act based on the nexus between investment and income chargeable to tax.
Summary: The High Court of Orissa was presented with a question regarding the justification of allowing a deduction under section 80C of the Income-tax Act when there was no direct nexus between the investment and the income chargeable to tax shown by the assessee. The case involved an individual who purchased National Savings Certificates and claimed a deduction under section 80C. The Assessing Officer initially disallowed the deduction, stating that the amount used for the purchase was not chargeable to tax. The appellate authority disagreed, emphasizing that the investment should have come from the income of the assessee, not necessarily from the chargeable income of the previous year. The Tribunal upheld this view, stating that as long as the investments do not exceed the income available to the assessee, the deduction under section 80C should be allowed. In the subsequent legal proceedings, the Revenue argued that the deduction under section 80C should only be allowed if the sum paid was from the income in the previous year by the assessee and had a direct nexus with the income chargeable to tax. On the other hand, the assessee's counsel contended that as long as the amount was paid from an income that was chargeable to tax at any point, the deduction should be permissible. The court examined section 80C, concluding that the deduction can only be claimed if the sum paid in the previous year is from the chargeable income of the assessee during that year. Without this direct nexus, the deduction cannot be allowed. Therefore, the court held that the Tribunal was not justified in allowing the deduction under section 80C without a clear link between the investment and the income chargeable to tax. The judgment favored the Revenue and went against the assessee.
|
